Sunday, July 30, 2006
Mel Gibson's Drunken Anti-Semetic Weekend
"F...ing Jews.." he shouted. "They're the cause of all the wars in the world." Um, you're not going to open with that are you, Mel?
Jewish groups are demanding an apology. Hollywood is split over how this will effect his career.
"It's a nuclear disaster for him," said publicist Michael Levine, who has represented Michael Jackson and Charlton Heston, among others. "I don't see how he can restore himself."
Some see it a different way. "Ever since he made a film about Jesus (himself a Jew) Gibson's biggest fans are Christians who have a history of selective approval and poor discernment," said an entertainment analyst. "I predict all will be forgotten by the paying public by Easter."
Gibson has since issued an apology.
Read the whole story here.
Tomorrow's Vets
Swaying off the usual Defense Department endorsed message Private Steven Green told Andrew Tilghman of the Washington Post, "I came here because I wanted to kill people."
He then reflected, "Over here, killing people is like squashing an ant. I mean, you kill somebody and it's like 'All right, let's go get some pizza.'"
You might know Pvt Green better as the man now on trial for premeditated rape and murder of an Iraqi girl and her family.
I hesitated to link this story, concerned that it might be misconstrued. I think most of our military men and women are noble. I know many of them. But I think this article gives an honest look at the "constant violence" our soldiers are under in Iraq and what type of coping skills it all too often produces.
Pvt. Green talks about watching a good friend die. He then complains, "See, this war is different from all the ones that our fathers and grandfathers fought. Those wars were for something. This war is for nothing."
But he's wrong. This type of thing has happened before and the victims names are etched in black granit on a wall in Washington, and many who surived still fight the war in their minds. I think it's important that we not distance ourselves from what we've sent our men and women to do. I think it's important that we turn and face it and own up to it, which is why I've linked this story. If the truth hurts, it's nothing compared to what they feel.
read the whole story here.
Friday, July 28, 2006
The Birth from Hell
This is not the first time the Bush administration has used the term “birth pangs” to explain horrible violence and chaos from Somalia to Afghanistan. They’ve taken a page out of Jesus’ playbook (Matthew 24). Many will be misled, wars and rumors of wars, nation against nation, there will be famines and earthquakes—these, according to Jesus, were just the beginning of birth pangs—the signs for the end of time.
It’s a nice way of saying, “Apocalypse is messy.” Or, if you’re in the Bush Administration, “Creation is messy.” It must be an incredibly scary thing to be in labor. It’s at least reassuring to have a doctor tell you those contractions are perfectly normal. But what about when it’s proclaimed by someone who has never done this before? Would you be reassured? The new Middle East is being birthed not by doctors, but by people who play them on TV. I hear them saying “I…I read this in a book somewhere…this is supposed to happen.” Not reassuring if you’re one of the ones caught in the violent contractions.
In Jesus' case, the process was the delivery of tribulation to believers. To the Bush administration the pangs are the harbinger of a new Middle East, flowering with Democracy. Dr. Rice utters the phrase with a gleam in her eye, like a mad scientist watching the wondrous birth of a lab-created monster. It’s not ugly. It’s life. This seems to be like a science experiment gone terribly wrong, unleashed by arm-chair politicians and would-be world shakers.
And, to spin it, the administration has arrested both messianic terminology and the birthing process. Jesus may be flattered. (I don’t know, he’s not returning my calls.) but women should be outraged. Any comparison of this inept and ill conceived mess to the awe inspiring miracle of birth should be insulting. The people of the Middle East should also be violently upset. Oh, wait, many of them are. Theirs is the land claimed for this birthing process. Congratulations, you’re going to be parents of freedom. Here’s a flyer.
The actions of the administration have unleashed terrible violence and chaos and increased tensions across the region. Every day Iran moves closer to nuclear capability, recently attending North Korea’s latest test missile launch. Iran works through Syria which is funneling arms to Hezbollah which is firing rockets into Israel which is leveling Lebanon. And Secretary Rice proclaims that this is all part of the process, a wonderful Genesis, a flood of fire and brimstone that will bring about a new geo-political map in the Middle East. The statements are at best ripe with hubris, and at worst incredibly insulting.
I never thought I’d say it but I find Jesus’ version the more prosaic of the two. He may have spoke in parables and imagery about the end times, but he was not nearly as obtuse and ethereal as the current leadership scuttling in and out of the White House.
It’s been a wild ride for the administration. It started with a bold idea: what if a Democracy were planted in the center of the Arab world. What would happen? You can see the concept unfolding like the Genesis planet in “Star Trek III”—A projectile of democracy is lobbed into Baghdad, an explosion begins fiery political terra-forming emitting out in a widening circle, spreading all across the decrepit region, where eventually hope and freedom bloom like so many spring saplings.
A sci-fi reference in a political essay might seem misaligned, but I think that’s about where we’ve gotten to. We fund a foreign policy that appears to be one part messianic and one part Hollywood blue screen screen, and if you can tell the difference anymore you’re more adept than I am.
Of course, to explain it that way would sound crazy. So, we’ll just talk about Saddam’s WMDs and rape chambers. But what we’re really there to do is transform the whole damn thing in one bold move. It’s the love child any case study political scientist, arrogant industrialist, aggravated old man, or hell-bent Christian would love to have.
digg story
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Iraqi Prime Minister Escapes Iraq, Lands at White House
Violence, especially in the capital of Baghdad, has been increasing in Iraq ever since the U.S. invasion in 2003. It has risen since the President’s “Mission Accomplished” declaration, it has risen since the Vice President’s “last throws” statement, it has risen since the elections, and recently it has infringed upon even the “Green Zone.”
Some say Maliki is here to shore up support the US effort to bring peace to his country. Others say he is here for more mundane reasons. While violence has gripped Iraq for the last three years, unemployment and corruption are also on the rise. There is also the inability to train adequate Iraqi security forces.
“Listen, we don’t want to embarrass the guy or have the American people lose faith,” said one anonymous official. “Truth is, he’s going to just hang here for a while, do some conferences, dedicate some statutes. Things are a mess over there right now. Mr. Maliki is happy to be here.”
After addressing congress Maliki will break for lunch with President Bush and military families. His next move is anyone’s guess.
“He is here to shore up support for his country,” one of Maliki’s handlers said. “And while he is here he plans on studying your wonderful system of democracy, perhaps even visiting one of your renowned institutions of higher learning, eating at your elegant restaurants, and visiting your beautiful beaches. He is eager to learn all about America.”
digg story
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
How Being Poor Can Cost You
Some problems I ran into:
-I was unable to open a checking account so I was forced to use Western Union to cash my paychecks, for a fee.
-High deposit on a phone
-High interest rate on a used car
-Steep fees on credit cards
-When I had no health insurance I couldn't afford to get a bad tooth operated on at the dentist! Bad times.
Yeah, a lot of my own financial problems were self induced. When I was a wide-eyed college freshman I received credit card applications in the mail. Life was good! I thought the world was going to be my oyster. What I hadn't learned was that it had been arranged to take as much money from me as it could.
Nothing says “you’ve arrived” like charging your next meal on a piece of plastic, right? Soon I was charging all kinds of things. When my old K-car needed new breaks, thank God for my credit card! My ardor died down quickly once I started receiving the bills. I realized that “minimum payments” just meant “running balance” in legalspeak, which, in dollars and cents, meant high interest rates.
Once my rate shot up, and late fees started adding up, the fun was over. And, making about $140 a week in college to live on meant it was going to be hard to pay that debt off any time soon.
So, my debt graduated with me while I added my college loans. Later, when I moved for a job, I tried to close my checking account but I didn't leave enough in the account. The bank didn’t have my forwarding address so I didn’t even know. I found out when I went to open a checking account in my new city. It turns out I was essentially blacklisted and couldn't open a new account anywhere. I had to cash my checks at the neighborhood Western Union and pay my bills with money orders...all for fees.
Finally, my K-car broke down and I had to get a new car and faced a steep interest rate. The monthly payments, along with my credit card payments, monthly rent, etc, basically strapped me.
I joined the Air Force for the free health care, tax-free purchases, and at least four years of fixed income. I learned some new marketable skills (like programming) and eventually turned my financial life around (the rest is still working itself out). But, damn, I had to go through boot camp to do it! It don't come easy.
I'm absolutely sympathetic to those who are buried in debt, or have no options to increase their income. Someone who makes minimum wage earns about $11,000 a year. How is anyone expected to be able to live in and navigate through a society aligned against them on that?
The system has its ways of nickle and diming those who can't afford otherwise. Some people grow up with enough money to make plenty of mistakes and still recover--I believe our President is living testament. That's the real luxury when you're rich: the ability to recover from mistakes, financial or even physical. We all saw how debilitating poverty can be during Hurricane Katrina. Being poor always costs you, but sometimes it can kill you.
The simple fact is that those who are poor have less options, less freedom than others. Their fate is very hard to escape from. They can't afford the best lawyers. They can't lobby their representative. They can't bribe their city official. It sucks. The poor have less access to health care, education, a proper diet, and they can't even get out of the way of a hurricane. If aliens ever come to take over this planet before they round us up to work in their sugar caves they'll assume that we are already at war with the poor.
I still believe in free choice. I made bad financial decisions when I was younger and I paid for it with plenty of heartache. I just wish the plight of the poor wasn't so easily dismissed. I wish it wasn't so hard to get back to even once you fall behind. How come our Christian society has made it so easy for companies to take your money, and so hard to get them to stop? Have you ever tried to cancel AOL? When you're poor you have to sit on the phone endlessly. When you're rich you can just file litigation.
read original article
digg story
Specter to Sue Bush
This announcement came the same day the American Bar Association issued a statement saying the president was overstepping his authority by issuing statements which keep his execution of federal legislation conditionally based. Bush has issued at least 750 signing statements which give him the right to disregard laws on national security and constitutional grounds.
read more
digg story
Monday, July 24, 2006
Bush's Tactic of Refusing Laws Probed
The issue probed revolves around signing statements, an executive privlidge. President Bush often signs bills passed by congress and then issues a statement reserving the right not to enforce or execute them on the grounds that they infringe on presidential authority. Last year congress passed legislation banning cruel or degrading treatment of prisoners which Bush signed with an official statement saying he may not enforce the ban if necessary to prevent a terrorist attack.
read more
digg story
Sunday, July 23, 2006
Overstimulated Students Rip School on Wikipedia
Wikipedia, an on-line encyclopedia, is known for its extremely open policy on posts. To edit an entry on wikipedia a viewer simply has to click "edit this page." It has grown to become one of the most popular web pages on the internet.
The school, located in Omaha, Nebraska has since filed a lawsuit naming John and Jane Doe through the Douglas County District Court. Until the perpetrators are found the school has removed all the colored chalk from the classrooms.
Saturday, July 22, 2006
Homeless Man Turns in $21,000, Gets $100 Back
$100 is .005% of $21,000, about forty times less than you would tip your waitress in a restaurant. What does Moore plan to do with his bag of shiny nickels? Buy a nice shoe shine kit? Gee, thanks, mister.
Alarming Thought of the Week
See the clip on Hannity and Colmes.
Republican Rep. Steve Nass was quick to ask for Bartlett's removal, citing deviance, lack of patriotism, and called Barrett's views "academically dishonest."
The state Assembly last week refused to take up a proposed resolution supported by Nass calling on university to fire Barrett, who will get $8,247 as a part-time instructor this fall.
Read the whole story here.
Total Recall
Thursday, July 20, 2006
Soldiers Show Iraq Realities on Internets
"Vice President Cheney complained last March that the public's dwindling support for the war was due to the 'perception that what's newsworthy is the car bomb in Baghdad,' rather than what success has been had 'in terms of making progress towards rebuilding Iraq.' Talk show host Laura Ingraham encouraged those covering Iraq to "talk to those soldiers on the ground" in order to get a sense of all the good things happening there that should be "celebrated." By that logic, putting cameras in the hands of those soldiers on the ground
should provide enough celebration for an 'Up with Iraq' musical. "
Good idea here. Want to learn what's really going on in Iraq? Don't listen to the Generals. Don't listen to Sean Hannity. Don't listen to Dick "Deferment" Cheney. Get it from the source: the soldiers themselves. Listen to them on YouTube.
Read the whole story here.
Escape Kangaroo Terrorizes Irish Countryside
"This kangaroo broke loose just before the show while they were bringing him from the cages to the arena. He decided to take a walk," said local farmer John Walsh on whose land the two-year-old male, named Sydney, made his break for freedom.
Since the escape locals are reporting sightings of the fugitive marsupial which they have renamed"Hoppy."
Officials at the National Kangaroo Service, an Australian agency which monitors the movements of kangaroos world-wide expressed concern about the escape but tried to remain optimistic.
"I just want everyone to remain calm," said NKA official Langston Hughes. "Kangaroos wont box you. They wont sit back on their tail and kick you with their feet. They wont sneak into your house at night. They're peaceful unless cornered."
"I suppose if it had to be lost, it might as well be lost in Ireland." he mused. "At least it's not England."
This is second high profile animal escape this year. Hoppy joins Vivi the missing show dog as yet another animal to slip off the surly bonds of captivity and touch the face of freedom.
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
President Vetos Stem-Cell Legislation
I can think of no greater example of the healthy amount of ambivalence Americans live with every day than that residing in the stem cell issue. Every day thousands of Americans go to in-vitro clinics to partake in the wonders of modern medicine, in these cases to be fertilized so one day they can become parents. In those cases many eggs are fertilized so that one can be born. The remaining embryos are frozen. Again, is the belief that those embryos are alive? If so why don't I hear people of faith upset about the the hundreds of thousands of frozen lives currently in America? Or the practice that creates those conditions? Some will be adopted, but the vast majority will either remain frozen or be destroyed. How come up to 45% of Americans are against stem cell research but only the the most fundamental are against freezing humans alive?
Regardless, the bill President Bush vetoed on behalf of life applied only to excess embryos harvested for in-vitro fertilization that would be destroyed if not used for research. The bill’s reasoning was if they’re going to be destroyed anyway, use them for research. The president believes the embryos are alive, and he vetoes the bill that leads to their death anyway, with nothing gained. How logical is that?
The lives so many conservatives are trying to defend stay frozen in labs. How does that fact sit with their consciences? I fail to understand how the agenda of life is forwarded by either keeping embryos frozen or destroying them. If they had any integrity they’d go after the entire practice of in-vitro fertilization which creates the lives that end up hanging in limbo.
This debate turns not on any type of logic or reasoning but on emotion. At the White House ceremony today the president was surrounded by happy children born as a result of embryo adoption. It is wonderful that those children could be brought out of their frozen state, and nurtured to birth. Their lives represent a miracle of science and belief in the sanctity of life. But the fact is that none of the embryos affected by today's bill would have survived anyway. No life was saved by vetoing the bill. The question has never been about how many lives are being saved--the President has never tried to stop embryo "murder"--but how many lives are being lost now that no research can be conducted on cells that were doomed to die anyway.
Science remains a tricky double-edged sword most fundamentalists just can’t seem to wield accurately. Many use it to enhance their own lives, even at the expense of life by their own definition. We will be judged, if not in this life, then surely in the next, by our conscience and by our reasoning. Those who believe life begins at conception and participate in its creating and discarding carry a heavy burden. Ignoring certain facts will not alleviate responsibility. Often those yelling the loudest are indict themselves. They protest too much. They would do well to go and learn what this means: blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he believes.
Are You Getting Enough Oxygen?
Yes, as I've said before, in the future oxygen will be a commodity available only to the super-rich, or the five kings of Europe. So, my advice is to get it while it's cheap. Don't be the last one on your block to shotgun a can of air.
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
President Says Some Shit at Important Conference
“Yo, Blair, what are you doing? You leaving?
Blair: No, no, no, not yet.
Bush: If you want me to. I just want some movement. Yesterday, I didn't see much movement. The desire's to move.
Blair : No, no there's not. It may be that it's impossible.
Bush : I'll be glad to say it. Who's introducing me?
Blair : Angela. [German Chancellor Angela Merkel ]
Bush : Tell her to call on me. Tell her to put me on the spot.
(Our president likes to carry the ball.)
Bush : Thanks for the sweater. Awfully thoughtful of you. I know you picked it out yourself.
Blair : Oh, absolutely.
The conversation then turned to the Mideast Crisis.
Bush : See, the irony is what they need to do is get
Blair : Who,
Bush : Right.
Blair : I think this is all part of the same thing. What does he think? He thinks if
Bush : I felt like telling Kofi to get on the phone with Assad and make something happen. We're not blaming
At that point Blair turned the microphone off.
Many on the left have latched on and mocked the president for his language and impatience. Even the right’s Bill O’Reilly considered the conversation “embarrassing” for the president. However, I predict the inane banter and crude speech will only help Bush. Indeed, those on the right should be supremely satisfied that he appears to speak in private exactly as he does in public, with simplistic thoughts tinged frequently with impatience and annoyance.
Tuesday, July 11, 2006
Boom Goes the Dynamite Timeline
March 22, 2005 - Collins is asked to fill in as sports anchor on a
Early April - A video clip of the show appears on Ebaum's World
Early/Mid- Bloggers link the clip
May 3 - "Boom Goes the Dynamite" enters Urban Slang's on-line dictionary
June 10 - Collins does "The Late Show with David Letterman"
June 13 - Collins does "The Early Show"
No good deed goes un-punished. Collins stepped up to help out the
Only in
Don't be such a square, man. "Boom Goes the Dynamite" has become a maven's benchmark--utter it at a party and see who gets it and who doesn’t. Sure, it was born unknowingly, and that is all the better. I'd rather have some sincere hype than something forged by corporate
Why? The question is probably being asked: why? Why did this event become so popular? Rest assured, there's probably a team of advertising scientists trying to crack that very code right now. But undoubtedly there is something to shared embarrassment, innocence, and desire. Those forces are something American Idol effectively taps into when Simon Cowel destroys someone's dignity for huge television ratings. Just as many people tune in to see who gets wrecked as to see who wins. Just look at Collins' face at the end of his broadcast, he's hunched over, totally deflated. When the woman thanks him for stepping in all he can do is utter "yeah." You can't script that. We've all been in situations like that. Just as powerful as shared embarrassment is empathy.
What next? In just under two months Collins went from zero to Letterman. And the rest, as they say, is internet history. "Boom Goes the Dynamite" has been uttered by ESPN sports anchors, written into wikipedia, and even exclaimed by John Stewart last night on "The Daily Show." In what has turned into an Simpsonesque "I didn't do it" journey, the catch phrase has reached the very vault of corporate America. Move over, William Hung.
Thursday, July 06, 2006
Happy Birthday Mr. President!
“Wins”
2 elections
$1.3 trillion tax cut program
Signed No Child Left Behind Act
Partial-Birth-Abortion Ban Act
Faith-based welfare initiatives
“Losses”
Hurricane Katrina
Federal Marriage Amendment
Privatizing Medicare and social security
Cheney
Global War on Terrorism
Despite the controversies I believe yours will be regarded as a success story. You maximized your strengths, minimized your weaknesses, and became the 43rd President of the United States. Believe me, it will be studied for years to come. Happy 60th Birthday, Mr. Bush!
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
Why the World Doesn't Need Superman
Speaking of hero worship, I saw “Superman Returns” this weekend and hated it. Let’s face it, “Superman” is an ideal created out of our best hopes and dreams to fight our worst fears. The original Superman fought Nazis, the 2006 version is a deadbeat dad. He's been gone for five years and during the interim Lois Lane has borne his son and wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning essay: Why the World Doesn't Need Superman. We don't get to read the article but it's reasoning is established nicely just by watching the film. Is the Man of Steel humbled to learn he has produced a son? Is he saddened to have missed out on every bit of his life? Is he anxious to make up for lost time by trying to be a Super dad? Nah. He returns, imparts an adjuration to his son (while he sleeps) and then flies off. The movie is savvy enough to give us the Lois-Superman-child subplot, but certainly doesn't trust us or Superman to deal with it on any reasonable level.
And, I guess that’s how it is in 2006: everyone wants to be a mommy or a daddy, but few want to be parents. Of course Superman, like so many of us, is off the hook because he has important business to tend to. Personally, I think he should own up to his responsibilities and raise his child. But he doesn’t even have to erase Lois’ memory to make this one right. She’s already suckered some other guy into believing the child is his. My heroes!